| Upon the capture
  of Jerusalem from the Crusaders descendants, the Latins, who were
  in control of Jerusalem, Salah al Din al Ayyubi treated the citizens of
  Jerusalem with respect
  and dignity greater than was expected for in those times.    When
  the Crusaders had advanced upon the walled city in 1099, rape, pillage, and murder
  were commonplace.  Richard the Lionhearted, the head of the Crusaders
  army, received
  his nickname for the wholehearted aggressive tactics he employed during the capture
  of the Islamic held areas during the infamous Crusades.  Jews &
  Muslims were not able
  to live within Jerusalem at that time.  Men and old people were
  executed, women raped
  or dispelled from the city.   On
  the contrary, Salah al Din al Ayyubi displayed great magnanimity.  During
  the first few days of Salah al Din’s capture of Jerusalem an account by
  Ernoul the squire
  of Balian of Ibelin, the Latin leader who negotiated the surrender of
  Jerusalem to Salah
  al Din.  The leaders of Jerusalem, including the Patriarch Heraclius and
  Balian of Ibelin,
  discussed their military options after realizing they could no longer hold
  the city  against
  Salah al Din’s attack in 1187 a.D.  The citizens and army sergeants of
  Jerusalem put
  forth a proposal to launch a massive attack on the opposing forces thereby
  ‘dying honorably
  in defense of the city.’  The patriarch rejected this proposal claiming
  that if all the men
  died, the women and children would be left and most certainly converted to
  Islam by the
  Muslim forces.  Patriarch Heraclius advised that the city should be
  surrendered then the Latins
  would later seek help from Europe in order to dispel the Muslims.  They
  then dispatched
  Balian to negotiate with Salah al Din.  During the talks, Salah al Din’s
  army had already
  managed to raise a their flag on the main wall of the city.  “Why are
  you surrendering? 
  We have already captured it,” asked Salah al Din of Balian.  However,
  the Latin
  forces regrouped and succeeded in driving the Muslim forces away from the
  sector they
  had just occupied.  Salah al Din was so angered by this that he refused
  to settle with Balian
  and instead asked him to return the following day.  Fear gripped the
  population of the
  city when Balian returned without a truce.  The citizens, then crowded
  into churches to pray
  and confess their sins, beating themselves with stones, begging for God’s
  mercy.  Balian
  again approached Salah al Din and asked for a general amnesty in return for
  the surrender,
  but was again refused.  Balian then threatened that the Latins would
  fight to the death,
  burn their houses, destroy the Dome of the Rock, uproot the Rock, and kill
  all of the thousands
  of Muslim religious prisoners, (also killing the women and children of the prisoners). 
  Salah al Din then met with his commanders and told them that this was the moment
  to capture the city without further bloodshed.  An agreement was reached
  between Salah
  al Din and the Latins according to which they were granted safe conduct to
  leave the city,
  provided that each paid a departure tax.  All those who paid their tax
  within forty days were
  allowed to leave the city.    The
  city was finally surrendered on Friday October 1187 a.d. which was also the anniversary
  of al-Mi’raj the 27th of Rajab.  Salah al Din immediately
  released all of the religious
  prisoners who numbered close to 3,000.  The Latins meanwhile began to
  prepare for
  their departure and sell property and possessions to native Christians and
  merchants in Salah
  al Din’s army.  The church elders, led by the Patriarch Heraclius,
  proceeded to strip the
  gold, silver, and treasures from their churches.  Imad al Din reported
  to Salah al Din that
  the amount of treasure carried away by the departing Latins valued at 200,000
  dinars and
  that the safe conduct agreement was for themselves and their own property,
  not that of the
  churches.  Salah al Din replied, ”If we interpret the treaty (now)
  against their interest, they
  will accuse us of treachery, as though they are unaware of the real meaning
  of the treaty. 
  Let us deal with them according to the wording of the treaty so they may not
  accuse the
  believers of breaking the covenant.  Instead, they will talk of the
  favors that we have bestowed
  upon them.”   Some of the grand masters of the sects, Templar and
  Hospitaller, refused
  to contribute towards the taxes of some of their older and poorer
  parishioners.   Salah
  al Din sent his guard throughout the city to announce that all old people who
  could  not
  afford to pay the tax would be able to leave without incident.  He then
  proceeded to release
  thousands of slaves at the requests of the patriarch, Balian and his own
  brother, Al Malik
  al Adil.  Salah al Din also allowed many common and noble women to leave
  without payment;
  amongst them were Queen Sibyl & her entourage, the widow of Renaud of  Chatillon,
  a Byzantine princess living a monastic life in Jerusalem.  Salah al Din
  then proceeded
  to release 1,500 Armenians, also without paying tax.    During
  the departure of the refugees, Salah al Din assigned each group 50 of his officers
  to ensure their safe arrival in territories held by Christians.  One eye
  witness gave the
  officers credit for their humane treatment of the refugees, noting that these
  officers, “who
  could not endure the suffering of the refugees, ordered their squires to
  dismount and  set
  older Christians upon their steeds.  Some of the officers even carried
  Christian children in
  their arms (during the journey).”    During
  the whole takeover of the holy city, rape, pillage, torture, and unjust
  treatments were
  outlawed and not allowed by Salah al Din as he claimed this was un-Islamic
  and not  seemly
  behavior from Muslims, war or not.  Religious freedom was tolerated,
  enabling Christians,
  Muslims, and Jews to live side by side under the rule of Salah al Din, until
  the British
  incited revolt in 1916.      |