| 
   
    | 
 |  
    | "If you do not insist on a
    materialistic interpretation of Darwinism, then it has no problem with
    Islam." |  If
  you ask any person on the street in an Arab state if they believe in science,
  the likely answer will be a resounding yes. But ask the same person if they
  believe in evolution, and you will be lucky if all you get are some degrading
  looks. Normal reactions might turn downright hostile and offensive and
  chances are you’ll be called an atheist.  The only problem is that the theory of evolution is the basis
  of many fields of modern science. Ranging from how bacteria develop
  resistance to how we raise crops and cattle, it is all interconnected to
  evolutionary science. But does acceptance of evolution really dictate a
  disbelief in a higher being or a god? "For many years I thought that evolution was incompatible
  with Islam but then I started reading more about the tradition of Islam and
  about science of evolution and came to believe that there are many areas of
  compatibility," said Nidhal Guessoum, professor at the American
  University of Sharjah, UAE. "If you do not insist on a materialistic
  interpretation of Darwinism, then it has no problem with Islam." In fact, Guessoum quotes several Muslim scientists between the
  9th and the 14th century who studied natural sciences and adopted various
  forms of evolution. But professor John Hedley Brooke of the University of Oxford,
  UK, thinks that evolution and some faiths cannot be fully reconciled. "I
  believe that ultimately [faith and evolution] are compatible, but there are
  problems, and history shows that. And we need to discuss them." The problem is that the theory of evolution is often framed as
  a philosophical issue rather than a scientific issue, especially in
  Muslim-majority countries. "There is widespread misinformation about
  theories of evolution among Muslims," said Salman Hameed, associate
  professor of Integrated Science & Humanities at Hampshire College, US.
  New atheism, which strongly associates itself with evolution, is also
  affecting the general attitude towards evolution in the Muslim world.
  "But there is no clear doctrinal opposition to evolution in Islam,"
  he told IslamOnline.net (IOL). But creationists from the West who associate evolution with
  atheism actively import those ideas into Muslim states. Due to its
  intricately religious nature, this part of the world automatically refuses
  evolution. During a conference in Alexandria, Egypt commemorating
  Darwin's 200th birthday and 150 years since publication of his pivotal book
  "On the Origin of Species", Reverend Michael Roberts, from the
  University of Lancaster, UK, spoke about the spread of creationism from the
  US to the world since 1980. But the US version of creationism, according to
  him, is totally untrue and unscientific. "If creationism is given support,
  science will be pushed back." In fact, he stressed that teaching creationism can snap back
  and expose religions as being ridiculous and encourage more secularism. 
   
    |  "So the end result we'll be asking, who is going to
    shape the evolution debate? An emphasis on science or will it be seen as a
    threat to religious belief?" |  In
  a survey that Hameed conducted on the acceptance of evolution amongst
  Muslims, the highest scoring Muslim country was Kazakhstan (which was part of
  the former Soviet Union) with 35 percent agreeing with the theory. The lowest
  scoring country was Egypt, where only eight percent of the population accepts
  Darwinism. In fact, all Egyptian school teachers surveyed said that, while
  they had to teach evolution as part of the science curriculum, they explained
  to the students that the theory was wrong and told them not to believe it.  "Teachers need to know about evolution, but also need
  training on how to bridge the gaps between the students' worldview and the
  scientific worldview and how to involve learners in arguments," said
  Saouma BouJaoude, professor of science education at the American University
  of Beirut. Hameed added that a lot of people in the Muslim world think we
  should not even be talking about evolution. "We have no shortage of
  medical students. There are many new biotechnology and biomedicine schools
  opening up. Why stir the pot?" they ask. "But the question is how far can one go without basic
  research? Eventually the end result is you maintain a clientele with more
  developed countries." One of the main problems that Hameed sees is who will get to
  interpret evolution in a religious context for Islam. "Unlike
  Catholicism, for example, we have a fragmented authority in religion." For Hameed, it is important to start having informed, serious
  discussions about the theories of evolution in the Islamic world. He stressed that in Islam, there is always a focus on the
  harmony between religion and science. "So the end result we'll be
  asking, who is going to shape the evolution debate? An emphasis on science or
  will it be seen as a threat to religious belief?" 
   
    | 
 |  
    | Giraffe's evolution to meet needs. |  Martin
  Davidson, chief executive of the British Council, UK, stressed the importance
  of having these debates within a framework of cultural and religious
  sensitivities. "A discussion about Darwin that ignores faith will fail,
  but one that depends solely on it risks the same fate."  Guessoum added that scientific research in evolution is very
  important, rather than being fixated on its relationship to faith. In a discussion that Guessoum had with some students during
  the conference held at the Bibliotheca Alexandrina from 14 to 16 November,
  their initial reaction to the idea of human evolution was very hostile. They
  were not even willing to discuss the possibility of the theory being right.
  In addition, their scientific discussions were very dated, often citing
  missing information from the theory of evolution that has long since been
  discovered. "I urge you to go back and read about evolution. Educate
  yourself and learn more of it and then make an informed decision," he
  told the students. "If afterwards you still disagree with it, then
  that's all right. The important thing is to base your decision on proper
  science." But Guessoum's argument might have fallen on deaf ears. As the
  students walked away, they did not seem to budge from their initial stance. "No one will change someone's opinion in 10
  minutes," Guessoum told IOL. "But maybe we'll meet again in a few
  years and they would have read and learned more about evolution – enough to
  make a balanced discussion." |