| 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   | 
Saturday, December 09, 2006ISLAM AND DEMOCRACY CAN CO-EXIST 
 © Duncan Graham
 French Muslim scholar Soheib Bencheikh, 45, has been touring Java giving 
speeches and meeting key people, including the Indonesian Ulemas’ Council (MUI). 
He was born in Saudi Arabia, lived in Algeria, studied in Egypt and now heads an 
Islamic teaching institute in Paris.
 
 Bencheikh, the former Grand Mufti of Marseilles, became famous for supporting 
the ban on Islamic headscarves in France. Before giving a speech in Arabic 
to staff and students at Surabaya’s State Islamic University he spoke to Duncan 
Graham:
 
 Isn’t Islam and democracy a contradiction? Doesn’t Islam say only God can be 
supreme, not the people?
 
 Have you ever heard God speaking to you? He speaks through the people. He’s left 
a message to us that must be interpreted by us, the people. Men and women have 
their own understanding of that message.
 
 Those who say Islam and democracy can’t co-exist don’t understand either term. 
There’s a great lack of knowledge.
 
 To be a thinking person is to always be searching and constantly having doubts. 
How can an intelligent human have total belief in any faith?
 
 They can’t. The 100 per cent believer doesn’t exist. Nor is there a 100 per cent 
atheist. Between the extremes of total belief and non-belief there are many 
positions – and these are constantly changing. Today you may have only a few 
doubts – tomorrow, many.
 
 The real test for all theologians is to constantly interrogate the self.
 
 Last year the MUI issued an edict against pluralism, liberalism and secularism. 
What’s your response?
 
 They’re going backwards if they think they’re still living in a time when 
nations were separate and didn’t interact.
 
 The idea that the state should be more Islamic is coming from history, not the 
holy texts.
 
 A secular state protects minorities. If France didn’t have liacite (the law 
prohibiting the state recognising religion and now a core value in French 
culture) then Muslims would be at risk from the Catholic majority. This protects 
everyone – but many Moslems don’t understand the history of liacite.
 
 A secular state also protects by keeping politics out of religion. Politicians 
try to use religion to further their personal interests. Without religion, 
political debate can be rational and free of dogma
 
 Religion without politics attracts only those genuinely interested in faith – it 
liberates religion from the opportunists.
 
 In Indonesia the majority follow Islam, and the state demands all belong to one 
of the government-approved religions.
 
 We should not use force, but respect. There should be no pressure on the 
conscience - people should be free to choose or not choose.
 
 All the more reason for a secular government to protect the minorities. Even 
here in Indonesia you have to be prepared to recognize that Islam is a minority 
religion in the world.
 
 The reality is a future where there will be no single majority religion.
 
 How do you respond to those who say the Koran is the word of God and cannot be 
questioned or tampered with in any way?
 
 The book itself isn’t sacred – it’s the objective ideas within the text. When we 
talk about the book we have to think about the language that was used, the 
context, and the culture at the time – even the weather!
 
 In Indonesia we’ve had a preacher jailed for leading prayers in Indonesian.
 
 At the time of the Prophet there was no unified Arab language. The language used 
in the Koran was that of the Prophet’s tribe. From the very first Muslims were 
authorized to use their own languages.
 
 Some say that although Muslims in Indonesia are in the majority they suffer from 
an inferiority complex.
 
 Arab civilisation was once the highest in the world. It helped lead to the 
Renaissance in Europe. Now everything has moved to the West. Arab civilisation 
is finished! We need to be part of what’s happening in the West – either that or 
live in the nostalgia of the past.
 
 It’s always easier to blame others for our problems rather than look into 
ourselves to see what’s wrong. We have to recognize that we don’t have a 
monopoly on ethics and morality.
 
 If the light goes out in your room is it best to sit in the darkness, or ask 
your neighbors if you can share in their illumination, or fix the problem?
 
 Export your Indonesian form of Islam to the world. Don’t try and import from the 
Arabs.
 
 You have a moderate form of Islam here synthesized with other beliefs. We should 
not be afraid to express our ideologies, ask questions of ourselves and through 
such questioning, develop our thinking.
 
 Modern Islam is sweeping away all traditions – that’s too easy and not 
convincing. The challenge is to go back to the Koranic text and apply new 
readings that are applicable today.
 
 Islamic culture is brilliant! If you love others you want to share your culture 
with them – and we want to share.
 
 Muslims were wrong to protest against Danes when cartoonists lampooned the 
Prophet.
 
 This is what freedom of expression means. Even if people are mocking, at least 
they’re showing an interest in Islam and starting to recognize it as part of 
society.
 
 Could you talk like this is Saudi Arabia?
 
 Yes, because I’m not attacking Islam.
 
 But you’re attacking some people’s ideas of Islam.
 
 The people most disturbed by the idea of a secular state are politicians who try 
to maintain power by using Islam. These legislators are hypocrites. This power 
is temporal.
 
 Islam is not the property of individuals – it’s a message to the world.
 
 (First published in The Jakarta Post 8 December 06)
 
 
 Source: 
http://indonesianow.blogspot.com/2006/12/soheib-bencheikh.html   |