The Political Misfortunes of Muslims
			By Maulana Wahiduddin Khan
			Indian Muslims, comprising so large a segment of the population 
			that they can top the polls in any one of a hundred constituencies, 
			are in a position to tip the political balance of the entire 
			country. Yet, paradoxically, it is the Muslim community, more than 
			any other, which is suffering from political deprivation. 
			Individually certain Muslims have managed, as a matter of chance, 
			to secure an insignificant number of political posts, but the Muslim 
			community as a whole enjoys no political pre-eminence on the 
			national scene. Nor does it, at the international level, have any 
			share in establishing political 
			relations with Muslim countries. Even in so relatively small a 
			country as Sri Lanka, the Muslim minority has greater political 
			standing than its Indian counterpart. It is common for Muslim 
			writers and speakers to lay the blame for this at the door of the 
			Hindus. But this view is entirely without foundation. In this world, 
			by the very law laid down by God, gain and loss are not external but 
			internal in their origins. Any explanation seeking to hold others 
			responsible for our deprivation must be rejected prima facie, since 
			it in no way accords with the law of nature. If the truth be told, 
			it is the incompetence of Muslim leaders which has given rise to 
			this unfortunate situation. And 
			Muslims, in actual fact, are now being made to pay for the crass 
			inaptitude of leaders who launched movements based on shallow 
			politics instead of creating among their followers a balanced 
			political awareness-something for which there was a crying need.
			If you go around any Indian city during the elections, you will 
			find greater fervor for the elections in Muslim localities than in 
			Hindu conclaves. This is a symbolic indication of the error which 
			has led Muslims into their present state of political neglect. 
			Misguided by incompetent leaders, they have come to feel that in 
			simply empathizing with the national election fever, they are making 
			an adequate contribution to the political scenario. They have 
			stopped short of understanding that taking a real part in politics 
			means full participation in the political processes of the country.
			Muslims may display great zeal for sehri (food taken before dawn 
			during the fasting of Ramadan) and Iftar (the breaking of a fast in 
			the evening after fasting all day during Ramadan), and for 
			sermonizing on loudspeakers during the month of Ramadan, but they 
			cannot be credited with taqwa (piety) if throughout the year they 
			have not lead pious lives. Similarly, the mere display of enthusiasm 
			for election activities on a few specified days will not bring them 
			any significant political position in the country. They must realize 
			that, for this, they must engage themselves fully and unremittingly 
			in constructive national activity.
			From 1947 till today, I have attended innumerable meetings 
			without coming across any notable Muslim gathering which had been 
			convened specifically to discuss the problems of the 
			Indian nation. National issues simply do not figure on Muslim 
			agendas. At Muslim meetings, communal issues, or more often, 
			communal grudges are the favorite subjects of discussion. It would 
			seem that national issues are of no concern to Muslims. I have often 
			found, moreover, that Muslim 
			speakers, invited to Hindu gatherings, give vent even there to 
			the grudges of the Muslim community against the Hindus. This makes 
			it abundantly obvious that Muslims have in no way identified 
			themselves with the political mainstream of the country.
			Muslims need seriously to consider the necessity to make their 
			community an integral factor in the political system. For a start, 
			their mode of entry into it could be an indirect one. For instance, 
			Muslims could launch the publication of such newspapers as would be 
			read throughout the country; 
			they could play an effective role in trade unions and other such 
			institutions which have a considerable influence on politics. But 
			there is no significant Muslim presence in these organizations. And 
			Muslim newspapers, if they are worth the name, are little better 
			than communal complaint bulletins, bearing no relation to national 
			Journalism. So far as trade unionism is concerned, Muslims are 
			barely aware of it as a concept. And so on.
			Over the last fifty years, under the guidance of self-styled 
			Muslim leaders, what Muslims have largely done in the name of 
			political activity is to vote for Congress. Yet, throughout this 
			period they have never felt the need to become part of the 
			administrative structure of the Congress Party. Now, frustrated with 
			the Congress, they tread the path of negative voting. At present, 
			any party claiming to oppose Congress policies can have the Muslim 
			vote for the asking. To my way of thinking, if Muslims want to have 
			what is politically their due, they should first of all establish 
			their own viability visa-vis mainstream politics. Only then will 
			they be in a position to chalk out any real election program and 
			secure benefits which at the moment seem beyond their reach.
			For this to become a reality, Muslims must develop a strong 
			journalistic network which is decidedly national in character. This 
			will establish the bona fides of their patriotism and provide an 
			acceptable base from which to project a positive Muslim identity 
			with a wholesome political stance. However, a brand of Muslim 
			journalism which is genuinely national in character cannot come into 
			existence simply by calling some publication a 'national newspaper' 
			and placing it on the news stands. In order to launch and sustain 
			such a venture, Muslims will be obliged to enter the field of 
			industry. For, in the world of today, industry is the institution 
			which 'feeds' the national press. So long as Muslims have 
			no appreciable share in large scale industry, they will not bring 
			into existence any journalism worth the name. But it is not just the 
			lack of their own nationwide press that helps to perpetuate the 
			Muslims' political under-representation. Even journalistic 
			opportunities in the existing national press are not availed of by 
			them because of their own backwardness. Major national issues may be 
			regularly thrashed out in the national dailies, but whenever there 
			is a Muslim contribution, it may be taken for granted that it is 
			about some narrow communal issue and takes the form of a demand or a 
			protest. Letters and articles by Muslims (and I have seen this in 
			several major national dailies), far from urging Muslim 
			participation in national political processes, are mere expressions 
			of Muslim reactions against others in restricted local sphere.
			Muslims need to be roused to a proper political awareness. They 
			must be led to understand that politics, far from being just another 
			name for reaction or negative voting, is actually the science and 
			art of government. They must realize that inflicting defeat on one 
			party in order to make another party victorious is only one aspect 
			of politics. And it is nothing more than a kind of political 
			somersault. If such somersaults have not improved the Muslims' 
			situation in the past, they are even less likely to do so in the 
			future. Muslims will have to make their presence felt-in a positive 
			sense-in the political environment of the country, they will have to 
			participate actively in the ongoing political 
			processes. And they will have to prove at the national level that 
			such participation on their part is of vital significance. For 
			instance they can provide an important link in establishing good 
			relations between India and West Asian Muslim countries to the 
			Indian State, etc.
			It is regrettable that present circumstances and current 
			attitudes rule out hopes of any such activity. For instance, 
			whenever our Muslim leaders, both religious and secular, visit 
			Muslim or Arab countries, they present a negative picture of India, 
			projecting it as an anti-Muslim country. Due 
			to this unwise approach, it is not possible to secure the kind of 
			contribution from Muslim countries which would significantly enhance 
			the religion to reach the point of a great status of Indian Muslims. 
			If Muslims, on the other hand, were to play a positive international 
			role-which is certainly 
			possible-they would see a sudden and radical improvement in their 
			image throughout the country. No longer would they be regarded as 
			liabilities, but as national and political assets. The day this 
			happens will mark the beginning of a righter future for Muslims all 
			over India. There is no doubt that India offers every possibility 
			for the construction of a great political future for Muslims.
			But the secret of securing such a future lies not in the ability 
			to make or break political parties at election time, but in the 
			reform of the community at the political level and in an increased 
			political awareness. The secret, in fact, is not external to the 
			Muslims but within them. At present,
			everywhere among the educated classes of Muslims, discussions of 
			the national Muslim agenda are going on. Meetings are being held. A 
			whole spate of articles is appearing in the Hindi and English press. 
			Books on the subject are being published. But nowhere do Muslims 
			figure in their activities. 
			They are almost entirely isolated from the whole issue. The 
			Muslim role in politics is the subject of much oratory and features 
			regularly in the press. But the founding of a political party on the 
			basis of a single community is more likely than not to exacerbate 
			Muslim problems. The need of the hour is for Muslims to join 
			national political parties and, by becoming part of their 
			organizational structure, 
			make themselves effective at the stage where political decisions 
			are taken. At present, Muslims in this country are viewed as a group 
			with a grievance. Nowhere do they assume the stature of political 
			entities, either in intellectual discussions or in practical 
			activities. The best way for Muslims to resolve this identity crisis 
			would be to throw them selves wholeheartedly into the political 
			processes of the country. I am certain that, in filling this great 
			vacuum, they would become a political asset to the country-to the 
			point where, one day, one of their numbers might ultimately become 
			the nation's prime minister. One country and one country alone.