| 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   | 
		Five 
		questions non-Muslims would like answered By Dennis Prager Dennis Prager's nationally syndicated radio show is heard daily in Los 
		Angeles on KRLA-AM (870). He may be contacted through his website: 
		www.dennisprager.com.
 
 November 13, 2005
 
 THE RIOTING IN France by primarily Muslim youths and the hotel bombings 
		in Jordan are the latest events to prompt sincere questions that 
		law-abiding Muslims need to answer for Islam's sake, as well as for the 
		sake of worried non-Muslims.
 
 Here are five of them:
 
 (1) Why are you so quiet?
 
 Since the first Israelis were targeted for death by Muslim terrorists 
		blowing themselves up in the name of your religion and Palestinian 
		nationalism, I have been praying to see Muslim demonstrations against 
		these atrocities. Last week's protests in Jordan against the bombings, 
		while welcome, were a rarity. What I have seen more often is mainstream 
		Muslim spokesmen implicitly defending this terror on the grounds that 
		Israel occupies Palestinian lands. We see torture and murder in the name 
		of Allah, but we see no anti-torture and anti-murder demonstrations in 
		the name of Allah.
 
 There are a billion Muslims in the world. How is it possible that 
		essentially none have demonstrated against evils perpetrated by Muslims 
		in the name of Islam? This is true even of the millions of Muslims 
		living in free Western societies. What are non-Muslims of goodwill 
		supposed to conclude? When the Israeli government did not stop a 
		Lebanese massacre of Palestinians in the Sabra and Chatilla refugee 
		camps in Lebanon in 1982, great crowds of Israeli Jews gathered to 
		protest their country's moral failing. Why has there been no comparable 
		public demonstration by Palestinians or other Muslims to morally condemn 
		Palestinian or other Muslim-committed terror?
 
 (2) Why are none of the Palestinian terrorists Christian?
 
 If Israeli occupation is the reason for Muslim terror in Israel, why do 
		no Christian Palestinians engage in terror? They are just as 
		nationalistic and just as occupied as Muslim Palestinians.
 
 (3) Why is only one of the 47 Muslim-majority countries a free country?
 
 According to Freedom House, a Washington-based group that promotes 
		democracy, of the world's 47 Muslim countries, only Mali is free. Sixty 
		percent are not free, and 38% are partly free. Muslim-majority states 
		account for a majority of the world's "not free" states. And of the 10 
		"worst of the worst," seven are Islamic states. Why is this?
 
 (4) Why are so many atrocities committed and threatened by Muslims in 
		the name of Islam?
 
 Young girls in Indonesia were recently beheaded by Muslim murderers. 
		Last year, Muslims — in the name of Islam — murdered hundreds of 
		schoolchildren in Russia. While reciting Muslim prayers, Islamic 
		terrorists take foreigners working to make Iraq free and slaughter them. 
		Muslim daughters are murdered by their own families in the thousands in 
		"honor killings." And the Muslim government in Iran has publicly called 
		for the extermination of Israel.
 
 (5) Why do countries governed by religious Muslims persecute other 
		religions?
 
 No church or synagogue is allowed in Saudi Arabia. The Taliban destroyed 
		some of the greatest sculptures of the ancient world because they were 
		Buddhist. Sudan's Islamic regime has murdered great numbers of 
		Christians.
 
 Instead of confronting these problems, too many of you deny them. 
		Muslims call my radio show to tell me that even speaking of Muslim or 
		Islamic terrorists is wrong. After all, they argue, Timothy McVeigh is 
		never labeled a "Christian terrorist." As if McVeigh committed his 
		terror as a churchgoing Christian and in the name of Christ, and as if 
		there were Christian-based terror groups around the world.
 
 As a member of the media for nearly 25 years, I have a long record of 
		reaching out to Muslims. Muslim leaders have invited me to speak at 
		major mosques. In addition, I have studied Arabic and Islam, have 
		visited most Arab and many other Muslim countries and conducted 
		interfaith dialogues with Muslims in the United Arab Emirates as well as 
		in the U.S. Politically, I have supported creation of a Palestinian 
		state and supported (mistakenly, I now believe) the Oslo accords.
 
 Hundreds of millions of non-Muslims want honest answers to these 
		questions, even if the only answer you offer is, "Yes, we have real 
		problems in Islam." Such an acknowledgment is infinitely better — for 
		you and for the world — than dismissing us as anti-Muslim.
 
 We await your response.
   
		ANSWERS:   
		A 
		MUSLIM RESPONSE TO DENNIS PRAGER'S 'FIVE QUESTIONS'By Hussam Ayloush
 WORD COUNT: 846
 
 [Hussam Ayloush is executive director for the Southern California office 
		of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-LA). He can be 
		reached at socal@cair.com. CAIR is America's largest Muslim civil 
		liberties and advocacy group.]
 
 In a recent commentary, radio talk show host Dennis Prager posed five 
		questions that "that law-abiding Muslims need to answer for Islam's 
		sake, as well as for the sake of worried non-Muslims."
 
 SEE: "Five Questions Non-Muslims Would Like Answered"
 http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/commentary/la-op-prager13nov13,0,1904398.story
 
 Prager said his questions were prompted in part by recent rioting in 
		France "by primarily Muslim youths," despite the fact that neutral 
		experts say the violence had little to do with Islam and it was Muslim 
		leaders who ultimately helped quell the violence.
 
 Faulty premise aside, here are answers to Prager's questions:
 
 Q: Why are you so quiet (about terrorism carried out in the name of 
		Islam)?
 
 A: One might argue that Muslims could do more to get their anti-terror 
		message out. But to say Muslims have been quiet about their unequivocal 
		condemnation of terrorism is a gross misrepresentation of the facts and 
		reeks of Islamophobia.
 
 It was after all a coalition of American Muslim groups that issued what 
		was perhaps the first condemnation of the 9/11 attacks. The Council on 
		American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) also published a full-page 
		advertisement condemning the attacks.
 
 Muslims have consistently condemned suicide bombings in the Middle East, 
		attacks on the London transportation system, the bombing of hotels in 
		Jordan, and many similar outrages.
 
 Muslims scholars recently issued a fatwa, or Islamic religious ruling, 
		condemning terrorism and religious extremism. (See: www.cair.com ) 
		Muslim groups in Texas and Arizona held anti-terror rallies. In Jordan 
		huge demonstrations were held against the recent terror attacks. Muslims 
		in Lebanon demonstrated against the terrorist assassination of former 
		Prime Minister Rafik Harriri.
 
 Outrage can be expressed in many ways. Public demonstrations are merely 
		one of many different methods available to oppose terrorism.
 
 Q: Why are none of the Palestinian terrorists Christian?
 
 A: Robert Pape in his book, "Dying to Win - The Strategic Logic of 
		Suicide Terrorism," shows that between 1982 and 1986, 71 percent of the 
		Lebanese suicide attackers were Christians and 21 percent 
		Communists/Socialists. Pape states, "Of the 384 attackers for whom we 
		have data, 166 or 43 percent were religious, while 218 or 57 percent 
		were secular. Suicide terrorism is not overwhelmingly a religious 
		phenomenon." It is a response to occupation.
 
 Inquiring minds might also consider the suicide bombings carried out by 
		non-Muslim groups such as the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka, the religious 
		orientation of the abortion clinic bomber or the depredations of Serbian 
		forces during the Bosnian conflict.
 
 Q: Why is only one of the 47 Muslim-majority countries a free country?
 
 A: Muslim majority countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Bangladesh, 
		and Turkey among many others having held free elections and being 
		governed by popularly elected governments will dispute the charge that 
		they are not "free."
 
 Moreover, only in the past 50 years, have more than half of the 
		Muslim-majority nations been freed from their European colonizers. 
		Despite winning this freedom, most continued to be client states of 
		their former colonizers who through the imposition of dictatorial 
		regimes maintained control, some even to this day.
 
 Opposition to such lack of freedom is generally Islamically-oriented. 
		Lack of freedom in Muslim nations is in spite of Islam, not because of 
		it.
 
 Q: Why are so many atrocities committed and threatened by Muslims in the 
		name of Islam?
 
 A: All major faiths have people who commit, or have committed atrocities 
		in the name of their religion. But no faith should be held responsible 
		for the crimes of a few individuals. It seems Prager believes that any 
		act by Muslims should be blamed on Islam. Just as we do not blame the 
		Crusades or the Israeli atrocities on the faiths of Christianity and 
		Judaism, we ask others to offer the same respect for our faith.
 
 Again quoting Pape, "The world's leading practitioners of suicide 
		terrorism are the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka - a secular, Marxist-Lennist 
		group drawn from Hindu families."
 
 Q: Why do countries governed by religious Muslims persecute other 
		religions?
 
 A: While there are areas of the Muslim world in which religious freedom 
		is not granted to all citizens, it is unfair to claim that this 
		phenomenon as a problem unique to Islam. Blaming persecution of 
		minorities on Islam is akin to blaming slavery and segregation on 
		Christianity. Choosing the Taliban as an example of religious 
		intolerance in Islam is disingenuous, because the Taliban's religious 
		perspective has been rejected by mainstream Muslim scholars and Muslims 
		worldwide.
 
 Every religious group has a responsibility to challenge hate by their 
		fringe groups. It is unproductive to single out Muslims while remaining 
		silent about the extremists of other faiths who vilify the faith of 
		Islam without similar repudiation from Prager and others.
 
 Dealing with the impact of war, poverty, racism, and injustice is our 
		collective duty. To achieve solutions to these real problems we need 
		voices that accentuate our common humanity, not use opportunistic smears 
		of an entire faith to further their parochial agenda.
 
 I would offer a challenge to Mr. Prager. Are you willing to enter into a 
		real dialogue, not an exercise in one-upmanship, with mainstream 
		Muslims? If so, CAIR stands ready to facilitate that dialogue, just as I 
		did when I appeared recently on his program.
 
 We await your response.
 |