| 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   | 
		Women Bashing and IslamBy Dr. Ibrahim B. Syed
 President
 Islamic Research Foundation International, Inc.
 Louisville, KY
 
		E-MAIL:
		
		PRESIDENT@IRFI.ORG 
		WEBSITE:
		
		WWW.IRFI.ORG 
		  
		In September 2005, an Imam who wrote a book 
		on how to beat one’s wife without leaving marks on her body, was ordered 
		by a judge in Spain to study the country’s constitution. 
		The judge told Mohamed Kamal Mustafa, an Imam of a mosque in the 
		southern resort of Fuengirola, to spend six months studying three 
		articles of the constitution and the universal declaration of human 
		rights.
 
		Mr. Mustafa was sentenced to 15 months in jail and fined about $ 2,600 
		last year after being found guilty of inciting violence against women.
 
		  
		A judge released him after 22 days in jail 
		on the condition that he undertook a re-education course. The Spanish 
		government has set up a commission to find ways for the Muslim community 
		to regulate itself. A central recommendation is that the imams should 
		speak Spanish and have basic knowledge of human rights and Spanish law.
 
 
		In his book “Women in Islam,” published 
		four years ago, Mr. Mustafa, the Imam wrote that verbal warnings 
		followed by a period of sexual inactivity could be used to discipline a 
		disobedient wife. If that failed, he argued that, according to Islamic 
		law, beatings could be sensibly administered.
 
 
		“The blows should be concentrated on the 
		hands and feet using a rod that is thin and light so that it does not 
		leave scars or bruises on the body,” he wrote. 
		MR. MUSTAFA’S LESSONS, which he must pay for, will be taught by teachers 
		from Malaga University.
 
		According to La Vanguardia newspaper, he will have to study articles 10, 
		14 and 15 of the Spanish constitution. The first two address “the 
		dignity of a person and inviolable rights” and states “all Spaniards are 
		equal before the law.”
 
		The third one states, “The moral and physical integrity of a person in 
		no case can be submitted to torture nor inhuman or degrading punishments 
		or treatment.”
 
		In the Qur’an, Surah 4: 34 reads:
 “Men are the {qawwam} of women, because Allah has given the one more 
		than the other, and because they support them from their means. 
		Therefore the righteous women are {qanitat}, and guard in the husband’s 
		absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose 
		part ye fear {nushooz}, admonish them first, then refuse to share their 
		beds, and finally {adriboo} them; but when they {ataa:} to you, then 
		seek not against them means of annoyance: For Allah is Most High, great 
		above you all.”
 
		  
		Is the husband superior and the wife is 
		inferior?  
		Throughout in the Noble Qur’an, 
		Allah emphasizes that men and women are equal for Him – Allah will judge 
		them in exactly the same way. It is hard to believe if a verse would 
		contradict this equality. But is that really the case here? The Arabic 
		word used is {qawwam}, an intensive form of {qaim}, meaning: ‘to take 
		care of, to stand up for, to look after’. Therefore, does this verse say 
		that men are superior to women? Not at all. It says: men must look after 
		women. In Islam, men are obliged to financially provide for their wife 
		and children. They have to pay for their housing, clothing, food, 
		medicines, etc. That is what {qawwamoona} means: men must take care of 
		women.
 
		  
		Beating One’s wife?  
		The verse instructs a husband 
		whose wife causes problems in their marriage to first talk to her about 
		it, then leave the marital bed, then {adriboo} his wife - and all this 
		in view of pursuing reconciliation as is evident from the subsequent 
		verse 4:35.
 
		  
		ADRIBOO 
		The Arabic word used here, {adriboo}, 
		from the root {d-r-b}, has several dozens of meanings, such as: ‘to 
		beat’, but also: ‘to forsake, to avoid, to separate, to leave, to part’. 
		(DOES THE QUR’AN ALLOW BEATING OF WOMEN? By: MOHAMMED ABDUL MALEK online 
		at
		
		www.irfi.org).
 
		  
		In Surah, Al- Nur, 24:2, describes 
		what should be done in case of adultery: “The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication, - flog each of 
		them with a hundred stripes...” (Noble Qur’an 24:2)
 
		This verse establishes the principle that for men and women, equal 
		actions lead to equal punishment. In case of adultery men and women must 
		receive equal punishment; surely there is no reason why they should be 
		treated differently for any lesser marital problem.
 
		Suppose {adriboo} means: ‘to beat’. 
		In this case, verse 4:34 says that when a wife causes a problem in the 
		marriage, her husband should first talk to her about it, then leave the 
		bed, then beat her and all of this in view of increasing his chances of 
		a reconciliation. On the emotional level, this certainly does not sound 
		like a very promising course of action. If one follows the principle of 
		‘equal behaviour leads to equal punishment’ then when a husband causes a 
		problem in the marriage, his wife can beat him. At which he could invoke 
		verse 4:34 to beat her again, so that the result would be a perpetual 
		physical fight between spouses! Surely, this makes no sense at all. And 
		indeed, it is not what Allah prescribes for the situation where a 
		husband causes a rift, as will be explained in a moment.
 
		Suppose {adriboo} means: ‘to forsake, to avoid’, possibly, as Mohammed 
		Abdul Malek suggests: ‘to separate, to part’.
 
		Then Verse 4:34 says that when a wife causes a problem in the 
		marriage, her husband should first talk to her about it, then leave 
		their bed (forsaking his sexual satisfaction), then avoid her even more 
		(not talking to her anymore, leaving the room when she enters it, and 
		possibly even leaving the house for a while), in order to prevent things 
		from getting worse, and on the contrary to let things cool down and 
		create enough space in view of increasing chances of a reconciliation.
 
		This sounds like a very logical chain of events.
 
		  
		Also, application of the general rule of 
		verse 24:2 (‘equal actions, equal punishment’) now means that when a 
		husband causes a marital problem, his wife should forsake a few of her 
		rights, avoid her husband in increasing ways, and try to work towards a 
		reconciliation. And yes, that is precisely what verse 4:128 says:
		“If a wife fears cruelty or desertion on her husband’s part, there is no 
		blame on them if they arrange an amicable settlement between themselves” 
		(Glorious Qur’an 4:128)
 Understanding {adriboo} as ‘to forsake, to (gradually) avoid (more and 
		more), possibly eventually leave altogether’, clearly makes sense when 
		relating several verses to one another.
 
		  
		Prophet’s Example 
		Beating a wife, would contradict 
		hadiths of the Noble Prophet who repeatedly said: “Do not beat believing 
		women!” It would also contradict the Noble Prophet’s instructions about 
		anger – which he explained to originate from Satan and which he 
		described as “a living coal on one’s heart”. One should not act upon 
		ones anger, lest one would do things and regret later. When a person is 
		angry while standing, “sit down”, the Prophet (pbuh) said. And if one is 
		still angry even in the sitting position, then one should lie down. 
		Interpreting this verse as allowing a husband to beat his wife, surely 
		contradicts these rulings on anger.
 
		Furthermore, Allah says in the Noble Qur’an that one must meet bad 
		behaviour with something that is better, not with something that is 
		worse, in order to turn a hostile situation into a friendly one:
 “Nor can goodness and Evil be equal. Repel (Evil) with what is better: 
		Then will he between whom and thee was hatred become as it were thy 
		friend and intimate!” (Noble Qur’an 41:13). Therefore the word 
		{adriboo} cannot really have meant “to beat”, can it? It must mean 
		something that is better than causing problems, and avoiding the 
		problem.
 Based on the foregoing, interpreting {adriboo} as ‘to beat’, causes 
		several internal conflicts with the meaning of other Qur’anic verses and 
		ahadith, while interpreting it as ‘gradually forsaking, more and more 
		and possibly leaving altogether’, is a much more logical interpretation 
		that is entirely consistent with the interpretation of other rules in 
		the Glorious Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Noble Prophet Muhammad.
 
		  
		Return to obedience?When the problem is solved, and the 
		wife is committed to the marriage again, then the husband is advised not 
		to keep using the incident against her and to consider the incident 
		closed. And the Noble Qur’an advises that when one of the partners 
		causes a marriage problem, the other should gradually avoid the person 
		who causes the problem, in order to save the marriage - irrespective of 
		who started the strife (4:34, 4:128)
   |