| 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   | Real 
		Debate About the Status of Women
		
 By: 
		Dr. Aslam Abdullah Dr. Aslam Abdullah 
		is editor of the Muslim Observer, director of the Islamic Society of 
		Nevada and the director of the Muslim Electorates' Council of America. 
		He can be reached at
		
		Aslamabdallah@AOL.com The Quran and the Prophet's 
		example show that women and men are endowed by their Creator with 
		certain unalienable rights, and that woman is not inferior to man. For 
		certain situations when the Shari'ah restricts or gives preference to 
		men or women, it does not mean discrimination. This should be understood 
		within the frame of the general objectives of the Shari'ah, which are 
		set by a Devine Law that is not subject to political correctness. These 
		directives are given by the Almighty God who knows our disposition 
		better then ourselves and has given us guidelines to order the lives of 
		men and women in a way that best suits our natures.
 
 On the issue of women-led Friday prayer, men and women alike, have 
		challenged the validity of the action and the sanctity of the motives of 
		the organizers.
 
 The overwhelming majority of Muslim women who questioned the rationale 
		behind such an action and refused to be part of gender politics imposed 
		by some is commendable. They demanded references from the Quran and the 
		sayings of the Prophet and they followed the actions of the mothers of 
		the believers (wives of the Prophet) who refused to lead the Friday 
		prayers to mixed gatherings even when they were in a position to impose 
		their leadership in prayers over the Ummah.
 
 During the battle of Jamal (Camel), mother of the believers Ayesha bint 
		Abu Bakr was in charge of the army she had raised to seek justice in the 
		murder of the third Caliph Osman bin Affan, the son-in-law of the 
		Prophet. She was the commander in chief. However, when it was time for 
		the Friday prayer, she herself nominated a man to lead the prayer. Would 
		the supporters of mixed gender women-led prayers call this action 
		hypocritical or intellectually inferior?
 
 Ironically, those who advocate women-led Friday prayers failed to give 
		any sound argument on the basis of the Quran and Sunnah in support of 
		their action. Some of them presented an event narrated in the Sunan Abu 
		Dawood in support of the claim that the Prophet allowed Umm Waraqa to 
		lead the prayer for her family members.
 
 It is said that the Prophet used to visit Umm Waraqa in her own home; he 
		appointed a Mu'adhin (one who calls the adhan for Prayer) for her, and 
		ordered her to lead the members of her household (in Prayer)." Umm 
		Waraqah-as stated in the sources-was an esteemed woman of Al-Ansar who 
		had memorized the Quran. 'Abdul-Rahman Ibn Khalid, the narrator of the 
		Hadith, further states: "I happened to see her Mu'adhin, who was a 
		person advanced in age."
 
 Based on the above evidence, some scholars have concluded that a woman 
		is allowed to lead her own family members in Prayer especially in the 
		cases where she is qualified over others who may not be so well versed 
		in the rules of Prayer and knowledge of the Quran.
 
 Paradoxically, people who have made women-led Friday prayers as a center 
		piece for women's rights also refuse to accept those parts of the Quran 
		and sayings of the prophet on issues for which they have developed their 
		own thinking. For instance, many of the supporters of women-led prayers, 
		also promote the right to validate same sex marriages.
 
 What they have proven through this approach is that they have double 
		standards in their selection of the Quran and the sayings of the 
		Prophet. They choose whatever suits their desires and they twist the 
		meaning of the verses when it does not fit into their intellectual 
		paradigm. Obviously, such people cannot be taken seriously in their 
		efforts to reinterpret religion for the betterment of the people, 
		including women.
 
 By applying double standards in their approach to study the Quran and 
		Sunnah, they have shown critical inconsistencies in their arguments. 
		Anyone or group who assumes superior intellect and is driven by 
		superficial standards of gender equality cannot be trusted on a highly 
		sensitive issue such as the status of women.
 
 Le us look at the hadith that is often quoted by the defenders of 
		women-led Friday prayer in more detail. It reads:
 
 Umm Waraqa said, "I said: "O Messenger of Allah! Permit for me to 
		participate in the battle with you. I'll nurse your sick. Perhaps Allah 
		will grant me martyrdom." He said: "Remain in your house. For verily 
		Allah will grant you martyrdom." And she asked his permission to take a 
		muadhdhin in her home. And he allowed her." (Sunan Abu Dawood)
 
 In another version Abu Dawood reports: "The Messenger of Allah used to 
		visit her in her house. And he assigned to her a muadhdhin who would 
		make the summons to prayer (adhan) for her. And he asked her to lead the 
		inhabitants of her home."
 
 The hadith was reported by Baihaqi, Hakim and Daraqutni. Hakim said, 
		"Muslim advanced Al-Walid ibn Jami' (one of the narrators) as being 
		authoritative. But this is a hadith with a single chain of narration (sunnah 
		ghariba). I don't know of any hadith with a connected chain to the 
		Prophet (Musnad) in this chapter other than this one." Imam Dhahabi 
		concurred with his findings. According to another Islamic scholar Al-Mundhiri, 
		"Al-Walid ibn Jami' is the subject of dispute (fihi maqal). However, 
		Muslim has reported through him." Ibn Al-Qattan said, "Al-Walid's state 
		isn't known." Ibn Hibban mentioned him in (his book) Al-Thiqat 
		(Trustworthy Narrators). But Ibn Hajar said, "In his chain is 'Abdur-Rahman 
		ibn Khallad (a second questionable narrator). And his status is unknown 
		(fihi jahala)."
 
 The opinions of scholars on the trustworthiness of this hadith cannot be 
		dismissed. Even if the hadith is accepted as it is, there are several 
		other facts that need to be taken into consideration. At the time, when 
		this permission was being given to Umm Waraqa, there were two very 
		learned and prominent companions of the prophet present in Medina, 
		Salman al Farsi and Osman bin Affan. Salman did not go to the battle as 
		his slave master denied him permission to leave and Osman bin Affan was 
		tending his wife who was suffering from some major ailment. None of 
		these two companions were asked to pray behind her. In fact, they led 
		their own prayers in the mosque of the Prophet. Umm Waraqa's house was 
		said to be a few miles from the mosque of the Prophet. In the absence 
		from Medina of a majority of Muslims including men and women, who were 
		given the permission to join the battle, the Prophet must have chosen 
		the most learned scholar of the Quran in her household with the 
		leadership role in prayers. In fact, it was a very bold statement in a 
		male chauvinist society, a statement that re-emphasized the point that 
		women are as equal in their spirituality as men.
 
 The fact that Umm Waraqa led the prayers for her household until the 
		time of Umar, the second caliph, speaks of the respect Muslims accorded 
		to the action and sayings of the Prophet. Interestingly, her household 
		members attended Friday prayers led by the Prophet or Abu Bakr or Umar 
		in the main mosque of Medina as their is no account to substantiate that 
		Umm Waraqa led the Friday prayers to a mixed congregation of her own 
		household members. We also do not see reference to any debate among the 
		women of Medina declaring their intent to lead the Friday prayers or 
		regular prayers in the mosque of the Prophet or any other mosque during 
		the time of the Prophet or his successors. They understood the 
		circumstances that led to the decision of the Prophet.
 
 Still, if there are people who have a different understanding of the 
		Quranic message or the sayings of the Prophet, they need to bring out 
		their argument in a rational way and try to build a consensus of Muslim 
		scholars over the nature and scope of the debate. They cannot impose 
		their opinions upon others. Nor can they intimidate Muslims for holding 
		a different viewpoint.
 
 Those who claim to be Muslims and follow the monotheistic concept of God 
		and believe in His message are not entitled to edit Him for their 
		convenience. Among the defenders of women-led prayers are those who 
		believe that this is the single most important issue that the Muslim 
		world faces today. This argument is also rejected by the Muslim masses 
		that believe that there are several other issues that deserve other 
		priorities. The Friday led prayer by Dr. Wudud will not solve any of the 
		problems pertaining to the status of women in the world. The supporters 
		of this initiative are suggesting that people who are on their side are 
		the only ones who understand how to prioritize Muslim issues. Seemingly, 
		these people have little regard to the voices of the Muslim masses.
 
 The divine decreed upon the followers of His message that they would not 
		discriminate among people on the basis of their gender, race or status. 
		He challenged human beings to rise above their interests to create an 
		egalitarian society where women and men will be respected for what they 
		are. The divine commanded them to complement each other rather than 
		fight each other for the roles given to them. The divine recommended 
		them to construct their relations on the basis of respect, love and 
		compassion.
 
 Some think that by standing in the front row of a mosque during the 
		prayer, the status of women will improve. Perhaps, we all can find more 
		spirituality standing in front of those houses where women are abused. 
		Perhaps we can all attain better spirituality by providing shelter to 
		homeless men and women. Perhaps we can all find a better meaning in our 
		religion by feeding those who go without food for days.
 
 According to our belief as Muslims, the message of God as given to us in 
		the Quran and shown to us by Prophet Muhammad will remain unaltered with 
		us until the end of time. History has shown that the majority of the 
		Muslim community has always rejected those who have explicitly shown 
		double standards in their approach to preach the Quran and Sunnah.
 
 Instead of creating fictional gender equality let us prepare ourselves, 
		for the real work. Let us organize ourselves, men and women of 
		conscience to ensure that no woman (men as well) is left uneducated, no 
		woman (men as well) suffer from the pain of dependency, no woman (men as 
		well) ever has to lead an unhealthy life in a ghetto and that no woman 
		(men as well) ever denied the rights that God has given to us all. How 
		do we do it? It is a challenge to our generation.
 
 The world of Islam, and indeed the entire world awaits the emergence of 
		a selfless group of workers dedicated to real change.
 
 Many of our leaders and religious establishments have failed us. They 
		have used the masses to promote their egos. They have deceived the 
		Muslims in to serving their own narrow agendas and in many cases have 
		distorted the divine message to make us more dependent on them. But our 
		Creator and His messenger with his words of wisdom are there to guide us 
		and lead us to the right path. Let us join hands men and women together 
		for a better world.
     |