| 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   | 
		
		American 
		Muslim Community Should Rise to the OccasionBy Moin Moon Khan
 Chicago, IL
 
		The 
		recently issued religious edict “fatwa”* by numerous American Islamic 
		organizations may result in a far-reaching impact, depending upon how 
		passionately it is implemented by them.
 Since the 
		9/11 tragedy, several American Muslim organizations have released 
		denunciations against violence in this form. However, the most 
		significant element of this document is the support from the 
		constellation of all the major Muslim organizations * Fiqh Council of 
		North America, Muslim American Society, Council of Islamic Relations (CAIR), 
		Islamic Society of North America, and Muslim Public Affairs Council as 
		well as an endorsement from the local Council of Islamic Organizations 
		of Greater Chicago.
 
		
		By 
		standing up against earlier fatwas issued by Al Qaeda and their 
		supporting outfits, American Muslims are upstaging irresponsible 
		rhetoric being generated outside the United States. In the same sprit, 
		peace-loving American Muslims are developing their own unique identity 
		that will distinguish them from Muslims growing up in Al Qaeda cells 
		elsewhere in the world. This declaration puts American Muslims in direct 
		confrontation against radical Islamists.
 
		
		Needless 
		to say, immediately following 9/11, American Muslims should have started 
		this battle of rhetoric and ideas. However, it is certainly appropriate 
		to say it is better to be late than never. But, if this condemnation is 
		purely a reaction to the mainstream news media’s criticism that Muslims 
		have not been doing enough to oppose suicide bombings, the effect of 
		this fatwa will evaporate before the next bombings takes place anywhere 
		in North America.
 
		
		This 
		pronouncement can work as an insurance contract for American Muslims 
		from any future backlash only if they display their disdain against 
		Islamic terrorists as ferociously as Pakistan’s President Pervaiz 
		Musharraf has exhibited.
 
		
		Like 
		Musharraf, American Muslims have to wage a spiritual battle against Al 
		Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist groups. On Fridays, sermons of 
		moderation should reverberate in all the mosques of the United States.
 
		
		The 
		preaching against infidel, if any, must cease. The culture of negativity 
		needs to be challenged. Seminars on the issue of tolerance, patriotism, 
		excellence, inspiration, and civic duties could help enlighten local 
		Muslims (particularly next generation Muslims) and make them more 
		vigilant to any unscrupulous activities. Muslim organizations can 
		encourage their members to report to their officers of any group that 
		advocates hatred. Islamic institutions could call FBI agents and find 
		out ways how to monitor such wrongful activities or the institutions 
		could develop their own internal policing system. They can also partner 
		with local law enforcement agencies in order to avoid any mistrust. 
		Islamic centers can hold classes on anger management, stress 
		containment, and counseling as they organize free health care 
		diagnostics. They can encourage their patrons to volunteer for local 
		PTAs, fire departments, Fourth of July commissions, zoning boards, 
		planning committees, advisory councils, and numerous other civic 
		organizations.
 
		
		These 
		activities can prove that there is no umbilical cord between suicide 
		bombers and American Muslims, and can reinforce American Muslims’ claim 
		that they are doing whatever is necessary to do. As a result, it could 
		silence the Islamophobic elements of this country that are certainly 
		fanning hatred against Muslims and alienating a few Muslims who are on 
		the radical fringes. Furthermore, instead of being on the receiving end 
		(by the accusation of being silent and soft against violence), American 
		Muslims can ask Muslim bashers: Are they hearing what Muslims are 
		saying?
 In order 
		to establish themselves as a positive element in the United States, 
		American Muslims have to demonstrate their commitment to the safety and 
		security of this country of George Washington, Albert Einstein, and 
		Muhammad Ali is as solidly as any US Marine’s. However, their loyalty to 
		this country (where their children were born and some of their parents 
		are buried) does not result in naďve acceptance of all the US foreign 
		policy objectives and adventures that are generating most of the 
		anti-American sentiments in the Muslims worldwide.
 
		
		Indeed, 
		there is a dilemma for the majority of Muslims in accepting policies of 
		unilateralism, regime change, and continuous covert and overt, as well 
		as dejure and defacto occupations of Muslim lands on one pretext or 
		another as is happening in Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, 
		Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Chechnya, and Iraq. They believe this is not a 
		war of civilizations or cultures or religions, but, undoubtedly, they 
		perceive it a battle of land, oil, and hegemony and not a benevolent 
		attempt to spread democracy.
 
		
		But 
		Muslims can also take comfort in the fact that vast majorities of 
		Americans, Britons, and Spaniards as well as various other people of the 
		West do not support the occupation of Muslim lands. They have 
		overwhelmingly sympathized with Muslims’ frustration with the foreign 
		policies of their own Western governments. Major anti-war rallies were 
		held in these countries and not in the capitals of the Muslim World 
		where the so-called Islamic governments suppress them as brutally as the 
		coalition forces that are allegedly wreaking havoc. In recent 
		parliamentary and presidential elections in Britain and the United 
		States, a vast majority of citizens voted for candidates who opposed the 
		Iraq invasion despite the fact that there was a kind of consensus on the 
		Afghanistan incursion. Anti-war candidates lost. But in democracies, 
		people’s mandates are respected. In the civilized world, bullets do not 
		change governments. The strategy of an eye for an eye does not bring 
		desired results for anybody. It simply delays the truce and endangers 
		the peace process. Opposing public policies is a legitimate democratic 
		act, but killing innocent people is immoral, illegitimate, and 
		reprehensible.
 
		
		Muslims 
		can learn lessons from the people of other faiths on how they have kept 
		their image intact despite setbacks. Admittedly, non-Muslims of the West 
		waged major fratricidal wars against each other on numerous times in the 
		last century that notably include WWI, WWII and the Holocaust, Vietnam 
		and Korean wars, and Bosnian ethnic cleansing. Atomic, chemical, and 
		Hydrogen weapons were developed, sold to others, and used on two cities 
		of Japan and numerous towns all over the world. Non-Muslims colonized 
		most of the world in the name of spreading religion. It’s also true that 
		despite these cataclysmic events, their religions were not called 
		violent or demonized as it is happening with Muslims and Islam.
 
		
		However, 
		in their defense, Christians and Jews have also invented many medicines 
		that we all use to cure ourselves, developed machineries, technologies, 
		and vehicles, established the League of Nations, United Nations, 
		International Monetary Fund, and European Union, made peace among 
		themselves and helped others to negotiate, created the Internet, 
		explored space, etc. Their academic and scientific contributions are 
		evident from the number of Nobel prizes they have received. Among them 
		were the top inventors, innovators, discoverers, and pioneers in the 
		last two centuries. In combating AIDS, TB, illiteracy, and recently at 
		the time of Tsunami disaster, they have outnumbered all other religions’ 
		records.
 
		
		Muslims, 
		and particularly Muslims who are living in the West, have to develop 
		similar contrasting levels of excellence and benevolence to downplay the 
		image of radical Islam. Most of the Muslim population went into the 20th 
		century nearly as powerless as they were while entering the 21st 
		century. In the recent G-8 summit, there was not a single Muslim seen on 
		the stage. In the list of 10 prominent industrial countries, no Muslim 
		nation’s name is appearing.
 
		
		It is 
		easy to get frustrated and disappointed, resulting in radicalization. 
		However, American Muslims, who have tasted and reaped the benefits of a 
		peaceful pluralistic society, should work tirelessly to help produce 
		leaders like Mandela and King. The peers of these men also thought of 
		violence as an alternative but these leaders took a high moral ground. 
		Similarly, the leadership of the American Muslim community should rise 
		to the occasion.
 
		
		(Moon 
		Khan can be reached at moonkhan2020@gmail.com Visit his website at 
		www.friendsofmoonkhan.com)
 
		    |