| 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   | 
Islam and Early American Liberalism 
 Posted: 07 
Dec 2007 08:28 AM CST   The portrayal of Islam and Muslims in early American 
literature is not as bad as you’d think. There are, of course, studies and 
doctoral dissertations on the topic, and they essentially usher in some 
unfavorable news. But that apparently is not the whole story. A credible and 
well documented book (almost 30 years old) suggests — actually insists — that 
Islam and its themes and heroes were instrumental in inserting “liberal” ideas 
in the political and religious thought life of early America which, at the time, 
was viewed as hopelessly fatalistic and closed.
 The book is Faith in Fiction: The Emergence of Religious Literature in America, 
by David S. Reynolds (Harvard University Press, 1981). Reynolds posits: “[S]ome 
American authors between 1785 and 1820 found in Oriental religions, particularly 
Islam, a safe perspective from which to comment on American religion in a way 
that was often liberal and sometimes freethinking.” The narratives linked 
“Oriental doctrine and progressive American ideas.”
 
 He also proffers that the doctrines of Islam were found “to be analogous to 
certain tenets of American liberalism.” Because of this, several writers wrote 
“Oriental” tales to promote toleration in America in the face of clenched 
“orthodoxy," especially Calvinistic.
 
 Reynolds offers many examples. For one, he cites a “sympathetic use of Islam” in 
a tale originally published in New York Magazine (1791) called “Mahomet: A 
Dream.” The protagonist of the story is somehow given the ability to call up 
from the dead anyone of his choosing. And behold, he chooses Prophet Muhammad, 
whose “spirit rises majestically before him. The Prophet holds a copy of the 
Koran that emits ‘a luminous ray, which convinced [the protagonist] that it was 
full of the Deity whose power and glory it so awfully announced.’” A Christian 
character reflexively calls the Prophet an imposter, “but a heavenly voice 
defends the prophet.” The voice says that the Prophet taught “the idea of the 
Divinity who observes all of our actions” and brings people to justice. Reynolds 
goes on to say, “The tale makes daring use of Islam to endorse divine 
benevolence, human morality, and religious fiction. The statement that Muslims 
initiated the idea of a God who dispenses just retribution on the basis of man’s 
works implies a rejection of the doctrines of divine wrath and human depravity.” 
(Humanity condemned to depravity undermines the sheer possibility of human 
progress, which is the foundation of original liberal thought.)
 
 Reynolds mentions several other narratives, like “The Meditation of Cassim the 
Son of Ahmed,” “The Arabian Tale” (by good ole Ben Franklin), “The Algerian 
Captive,” “Humanity in Algiers,” and others that found in Islam and its ideals a 
portal through which to comment (often acerbically) on an unrelenting religious 
view that damned humanity and disconnected the possibility of "works" as a means 
to higher development. As long as the doctrine of essential depravity held 
ground, progressive and liberal ideals were doomed. In Islam’s emphasis of faith 
coupled with deeds, and that deeds can be favorably viewed by God Himself, then 
human beings and their societies are indeed capable of progress.
 
 Reynolds also mentions some unflattering responses to the tales and their 
Islamic content, as well as some of the authors who themselves had to make 
mandatory inclusions of statements that affirm the superiority of Christianity, 
lest the authors be accused of apostasy or called infidels.
 
 Some of the narratives are surprisingly bold, especially when considering the 
tenor of contemporary public discourse about Islam, even by those who seek high 
office. Reversed tides and other metaphors clearly apply: today Islam and its 
figures are often portrayed to instill clenched religious and political grips on 
the minds of many. If you have a pulse, you know this already.
 
 In its treatment of Islam, the weight-bearing parts of Reynolds’ book are the 
first two chapters. The book is likely out of print. So look for it used, if 
you're interested. I found it years ago at a library book sale, where you buy a 
box for five dollars, and whatever you can place in the box is yours. The 
photocopier wouldn't fit.
   You are subscribed to email updates from
From Clay To stop receiving these emails, you may
unsubscribe now.
   Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner     If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal mail, write to: 
From Clay, c/o FeedBurner, 20 W Kinzie, 9th Floor, Chicago IL USA 60610 |